Singapore Budget 2024: Key Highlights → Click here to download the brochure now
Learn more
two people male female talking walking

Digital Economy and Corporate Income Tax (CIT) – A French Perspective

Aug 11, 2019

As of today, States’ tax jurisdictions mainly rely upon the existence of a tangible presence of the business on their territory such as the effective place of management, the employees’ place of work, the location of the business’s assets, the place where contracts are signed and/or where the business is managed.

But, as Sylvain Faurot explains, technology progress and the rise of the digital economy has made today’s international CIT outdated; a business can now, from one location, operate all over the world without having any physical substance abroad. Besides, and pursuant international CIT rules, such a business would generally be liable to CIT in the State from which it is physically carrying out its activity, and the source income’s states would have no jurisdiction for CIT purposes.

This situation is legal pursuant today’s intentional CIT rules, but is being vigorously criticised by States who observe an evaporation from their tax jurisdiction of significant incomes and potential taxable basis.

In this context, EU Member States as well as some OECD States, including France, pressed for establishing fair and efficient taxation standards with respect to digital economy. In 2018, the EU Commission presented proposals for a Council Directive laying down rules relating to the corporate taxation of a significant digital presence.

Although, no international (or European) consensus has yet been found on how to regulate the taxation of digital economy.

Given the fact that coming to an international consensus on that subject matter is likely to take quite a long time, French Parliament already passed a domestic Digital Services Tax (DST) which applies as from 1 January 2019.

Based on the commonly agreed principle that profits shall be taxed where the value is created, French DST relies on the consideration that web users, given their data and their web activity, have an important role in the business model of some Tech businesses, and, as such, actively participate to the creation of value of the services supplied by tech firms.

Therefore, one has considered that part of the profits deriving from the supply of such tech services shall be allocated to the tax jurisdiction of the State where the web users – as value creators – are located.

Notably based on that consideration, French DST is a 3% tax levied on incomes arising from certain digital services which are supplied to French web users, irrespective of the service provider’s location or place of business.

That tax, whereas initially designed for reaching tech giants, applies to tech firms whose annual incomes deriving from taxable tech services exceeds:

  • €750m worldwide and
  • €25m at French level

French Parliament recognises that French DST is not perfect and held that this tax is not an outcome but it’s a first step toward an international tax regulation of digital economy.

French DST is likely to be a temporary tax which may remain into force until an international (or an EU) regulation is found – The French Minister of Finances’ aim being that ongoing negotiations come to an international consensus by late 2020.

Source: https://www.bakertilly.global/en/news-and-insights/2019/november/digital-economy-and-corporate-income-tax-cit-a-french-perspective/

 

DISCLAIMER: All opinions, conclusions, or recommendations in this article are reasonably held by Baker Tilly at the time of compilation but are subject to change without notice to you. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the contents in this article, the information in this article is not designed to address any particular circumstance, individual or entity. Users should not act upon it without seeking professional advice relevant to the particular situation. We will not accept liability for any loss or damage suffered by any person directly or indirectly through reliance upon the information contained in this article.

Related content

Deal Advisory
Adrian Cheow • Jul 2, 2024
ESG Governance, Risk & Sustainability
Nicodemus Tan • Jul 1, 2024
Deal Advisory
Adrian Cheow • Jun 26, 2024
Reporting Accountant for IPO
Multiple Authors • May 14, 2024
Governance, Risk & Sustainability
Nicodemus Tan • Apr 8, 2024
ESG Governance, Risk & Sustainability
Lim Wei Wei • Apr 2, 2024
Tax
Multiple authors • Apr 1, 2024
Governance, Risk & Sustainability
Lim Wei Wei • Mar 25, 2024
We can help
Reach our team of specialists
Contact us